This article was
written during the World Economic Forum Conference at Davos, Switzerland
in Jan 2007,
so, therefore, it’s a little late. Sorry about that--Joe
As I type this Europe’s leaders, along with captains of
industry, news reporters and that guy who owns easyJet are over in Switzerland,
discussing what is to be done about the world’s great problem. Problem? I hear
you cry. Well, it’s a problem that’s been occupying the minds of the
governments of the world, the media and no doubt your very own employer for the
last 5 or so years. Still not sure what I’m on about? Let’s just say it’s world
wide and ends in –ing. Cottoned on yet? Good.
Anyway, go back to the start there and read through the
people I mentioned attending this conference-come-business-type-lunch. Spot the
recurring theme? Yep, it’s being attended by those people you love to hate,
Businessmen. (As an aside, I’ve already made my opinions on these people very clear in previous editions) Quite
why they seem to think they have the
answer is a complete mystery, as most (Mr. Stellios easyJet more than most)
have caused, or at least contribute, to global climate change. And all the
plans I’ve heard to combat it, from my own government specifically, seem to
involve getting someone else to do it for you. Not What I Call Progress.
Go and watch your media feed for a bit, be it TV, Radio or
otherwise, and see how long before someone mentions Global Warming. Now see how
they depict it. Chances are that they will not portray it in a favourable light
(if they do, please email me and I’ll go and kick their teeth in), but equally
the chances are that they wont discuss how to change the current state of
affairs. This seems to be the current theme of government and media; they come
up with a problem, blame it on you, and then leave you to formulate your own
way of solving it. Even when our own fair BBC actually mentions the latest
“Solution”, it’s always business orientated and will not help you in the
slightest. Unless you incinerate your own trash, in which case, you’re welcome
to try. Our corpocratic system seems to be determined to clean its own
conscience by at least attempting to do something, however unhelpful. This
could be a parallel of the old Protect and Survive vids of the Cold War era.
The problem is that most of these schemes, especially the
great green hope of Carbon Offsetting, seem to me (even though I’m no expert)
to appear not to solve the problem over a long term. All the schemes the
government comes up with are preoccupied with covering their arses until the
end of their current term, which is only a year away(ish), and then heap what’s
left to the new guy. In my experience of British politics, this is not very
surprising. But the problem will still remain, and we will still have to deal
with it. Maybe it is too late, maybe we are all screwed for the foreseeable
forever, but that’s just the worse kind of pessimism.
What everyone seems to forget is that the problem could have
been stopped along time ago. I found a quote from way back in the 1970s the
other day about Greenpeace warning we only had 50 years to fix our ways or we
quite literally fucked for all eternity. That was ~30 years ago. And what did we
do? Ignore them. Coal fired power plants are still in use, and still
planned for many areas of the world, Cars will never be scrapped because
they’re so damn convenient and I doubt we’ll ever ditch the world shrinking
power of air travel. Unfortunately what people also seem to ignore is that the
mass-pollution is the factor of the Industrial Revolution, which is still in
progress all across the world as we speak (for a specific case-study I’d
recommend having a look at China). It is part of social development and, sadly,
until we can find an affordable alternative to fossil fuels, and anything else
that can cause climatological problems, we stuck with it. That “We’re Fucked”
theory looks mighty appealing now, doesn’t it?
Of course the various governments of the world have tried,
as I mentioned previously. The other methods are wide and varied, but all
eventually lead down the same road of willpower. Yes, we have the capability to
solve the entire world’s power problems by the end of the month. Seriously! The
only problem is that no-one would stand for it. A Global Unified Power System?
Blasphemy! Communism! But that’s the problem isn’t it. We have the means, which
has been around for a good few decades now, but the current global mindset
seems to want to make money rather than save the world. Until we get a large
amount of people thinking against the
grain, we (or more specifically, the planet) don’t stand a hope in hell for the
future. The power to save the world exists, it’s just the big wigs have decided,
on our behalf, that it’s not worth looking into, because it won’t benefit
anyone. Except The Dutch (think about it, think about it). And now, if you
excuse me, I’m off to build a safe room under my stairs in case of Global
Warming induced flooding.
--Jittery Joe
--Once again, We’re
all fucked
January 2007
|